Editors Note: I have never been in favor of removing statues in an effort to change history. I am not an advocate of the Confederacy. In fact, I am ashamed that Texas joined the Confederacy against Sam Houston's advice, but the civil war is history. We can't change it. In a reversal of recent trends, The State of Tennessee has passed a bill withholding funds from the city of Memphis for removing historical statues.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The Republican-dominated House in Tennessee voted Tuesday to punish the city of Memphis for removing Confederate monuments by taking $250,000 away from the city that would have been used for a bicentennial celebration next year.
The retaliation came in the form of passage of a last-minute amendment attached to the House appropriations bill that triggered heated debate on the House floor and stinging rebukes from lawmakers from Memphis.
Rep. Antonio Parkinson began to call the amendment vile and racist before being cut off by boos from fellow lawmakers.
"You can boo all you want but let's call it for what it is," the Memphis representative said.
Last year the city of Memphis, which is majority black, was able to find a legal loophole to get rid of two Confederate statues and a bust by selling city parks to a nonprofit, which swiftly removed the monuments. Taken away under cover of darkness were statues of Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Nathan Bedford Forrest. Forrest was a general in the confederacy, a slave owner and a leader in the Ku Klux Klan. A bust of a Confederate soldier was also removed.
Parkinson, who is African-American, said he was sick of how fellow lawmakers revered Forrest "as if he was God, as if he was an idol."
"You remove money from a city because we removed your God from our grounds," Parkinson said.
A Republican lawmaker from Chattanooga who grew up in Memphis told fellow lawmakers that he loved the city but this was about obeying at least the spirit of a law to protect historical monuments.
"And the law was very clear, and they got smart lawyers to figure out how to wiggle around the law, and I think that's what the issue is," said Rep. Gerald McCormick.
The amendment that stripped the money away from Memphis was sponsored by Matthew Hill, a Republican from Jonesborough.
Another Republican lawmaker said removing the monuments was erasing history, he said "that's what ISIS does" and it was a bad action that deserved punishment.
"Today is a demonstration that bad actions have bad consequences, and my only regret about this is it's not in the tune of millions of dollars," Rep. Andy Holt, of Dresden, said of the punishment.
Another Memphis Democrat called the move to take away the money unchristian, hateful and unkind, and she said she was tired of lawmakers treating her city as if it wasn't part of the state.
"I know some of you all would be happy if we gave the doggone part of the state to Arkansas," Rep. Raumesh Akbari, said. "Arkansas would gladly take us. But I'll tell you something: I don't support this, and I think if you do it you're being ugly. It's not fair. Memphis is a part of Tennessee. I didn't even realize how much y'all disliked Memphis till I got to this Legislature."
The amendment passed along with the $37.5 million budget.